From: William Gladys <william.gladys@tiscali.co.uk>
Date: Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:41 AM
Subject: Fw: WHOM DO YOU TRUST?Libya: Removing Gaddafi not allowed, says the Queen's confidante David Cameron
To: world_Politics@googlegroups.com
Cc: Al-Hilal <Al-Hilal@sky.com>
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-12802749
21 March 2011 Last updated at 19:09
Libya: Removing Gaddafi not allowed, says Queen's Confidante David Cameron
Click to play
Gen Sir David Richards emphasised how closely the nations taking part in the attack on Libya are working together
The UN has not given coalition forces the "legal authority" to remove Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi by military action, the Queen's David Cameron has said.
The Queen's prime minister told Parliament a UN resolution allowing strikes on the country was "limited in its scope".
The head of the armed forces said it "absolutely" did not allow the targeting of Colonel Gaddafi.
But there is some confusion, as the Queen's Defence Secretary Liam Fox has said such action is "potentially a possibility".
Coalition forces, including those from the Queen's UK, France and the US, say they are trying to protect civilians from attacks by the ruling regime.
BBC political editor Nick Robinson said the UK government was walking a "legal tightrope" with the UN resolution and wanted to reassure Arab countries that it was not about "to topple" Col Gaddafi - and that Libya would not become "another Iraq".
On the other hand, the coalition did not want to risk "telling Gaddafi what they will do", our correspondent added.
United Nations Resolution 1973, passed last week, authorises "all necessary measures" short of an occupying force to protect citizens - but there have been questions about exactly what that could mean.
'Not allowed'
During a second night of missile strikes in Libya, Col Gaddafi's sprawling Bab al-Aziziya complex was hit. Western journalists taken to the compound were shown a ruined building.
On Sunday Dr Fox, asked whether Col Gaddafi himself was a legitimate target, said it could "potentially be a possibility, but you mention immediately one of the problems we would have, which is that you would have to take into account any civilian casualties that might result from that".
Laura Kuenssberg Chief political correspondent, BBC News channel
There is clear support for this action from most MPs but a lot less clarity about whether or not Colonel Gaddafi can be a legitimate target for military action.
On Sunday the Queen's defence secretary suggested it was potentially possible. The foreign secretary refused to rule it out. Then the country's most senior soldier, the Queen's General Sir David Richards, said it would not be allowed under the terms of the UN resolution.
That was disputed by government sources, who said, if there was evidence that Col Gaddafi was involved in violence against civilians, he could be a legitimate target.
It was interesting that the Queen's David Cameron did not necessarily spell that out in the Commons, and he seemed in part to fall behind the Queen's Gen Richards, saying there was no authority by the UN to explicitly remove Col Gaddafi from power.
It has come down to a bit of a tangle in terms of interpretations of international law. But there clearly has been confusion on this issue between the armed forces and those in government.
At this early stage of this operation in Libya, it is a confusion the government could have done without.
And the Queen's confidante Foreign Secretary William Hague did not rule out the possibility in an interview on Monday, adding he would not "speculate on the targets".
But, amid reports Col Gaddafi could himself be targeted, the Queen's military General Sir David Richards, Chief of the Defence Staff, told the BBC: "No, absolutely not. It's not allowed under the UN resolution and it's not something I want to discuss any further."
MPs are debating the UK's involvement in military action in the country, culminating in a vote at about 2200 GMT in the Commons.
Mr Cameron the Queen's confidante said Libyan air defences had been "neutralised" and that the world could not "stand aside while this dictator murders his own people".
The prime minister added: "But the UN resolution is limited in its scope. It explicitly does not provide legal authority for action to bring about Gaddafi's removal from power by military means.
"As I've said, we will help fulfil the UN Security Council [resolution] - it is for the Libyan people to determine their government and their destiny.
"But our view is clear - there is no decent future for Libya with Colonel Gaddafi remaining in power."
However, government sources told the BBC, in response to Gen Richards' comments, that, under the UN resolution, there was the power to target him if he was a threat to the civilian population of Libya.
US Defence Secretary Robert Gates said expanding the goal of protecting civilians could divide what he described as a "very diverse coalition".
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This email has been scanned by Google email security
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "World_Politics" group.
To post to this group, send email to world_politics@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to world_politics+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/world_politics?hl=en.
--
Palash Biswas
Pl Read:
http://nandigramunited-banga.blogspot.com/
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment